Enrol your children in schools or go to jail – Senate bill

Enrol your children in schools or go to jail – Senate bill

The Senate has passed for first reading a bill that recommends a fine of N50,000 to parents who default in providing their children with primary and secondary school education.

The Red Chamber also recommended free meals for every child in the country.

The bill proposed by Senator Orji Kalu titled, ‘Compulsory free Universal Basic Education Act 2004, Section 2’ states that every government in Nigeria shall provide free, compulsory and universal basic education for every child of primary and junior secondary school age.”

The act further states that “Every parent shall ensure that his child or ward attends and completes his primary school education and junior secondary school education by endeavouring to send the child to primary and junior secondary schools.”

“The Act further states that stakeholders in education in a local government area shall ensure that every parent or person who has the care and custody of a child performs the duty imposed on him under section 2(2) of this Act.”

Read Also:

Gunmen attack school, kills two teachers, injures VP in Plateau

The act further noted that a parent who contravenes the earlier prescription should be liable, on the first conviction, to be reprimanded.

“On a second conviction, a fine of N2,000 or imprisonment for a term of one month or both; and on subsequent conviction, to a fine of N5,000 or imprisonment for a term of two months or to both.”

The Senate, however, in its amendment, proposed N50,000 fines, instead of the N5,000 previously stated in the Act.

It stated, “A person who receives or obtains any fee contrary to the provisions of subsection (1) of this section commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding N10,000 or imprisonment for a term of three months or to both.

“Every parent shall ensure that his child receives full-time education suitable to his age, ability and aptitude by regular attendance at schools.”

However, the Senate proposes, N100,000 in replacement of the N10,000.

The Senate proposed, “Section 3(2) of the Principal Act is amended by deleting N10,000 and inserting N100,000.”

Responding to this development, the Programme Coordinator for Basic Education at Reform Education, Nigeria, Ayodamola Oluwatoyin, in an interview with reporters, noted that while the move by the lawmakers seems commendable, there should be an investigation into the additional charges by the public schools across the country.

22,556 Comments

  1. Right — have been messing about with this thing for something like six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d say something since someone asked me last week. I’m based in the UK, mostly do football and horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was honestly a bit daft — I never could get my head round what an e/w return actually came to once you get five places instead of three. Basically I’d wing it and moan when the payout landed. Now stick my stake in first, every time, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — type in your stake, the odds and you get the return instantly, either odds format. There’s also the fiddly ones — acca and treble maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I always lose track. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/each-way]each way betting calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    What really made a difference is the nerdier tools. There’s an probability thing that shows the overround, plus a kelly staking calculator — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. The dutching one is handy too if I’m splitting a race.

    Not all sunshine though. The interface feels a bit basic — no frills, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s fine though the acca grid are a squeeze. And no app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me but worth saying.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does the job. Anyone who even now adds it up in their head, have a look — saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  2. Right — have been messing about with this thing for something like six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m based in the UK, mostly do football and horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I could never figure out what an ew payout actually came to once you get five places instead of three. I’d just guess and moan when the payout landed. These days I punch the numbers in before every slip, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator is the part I open most — you drop in the price and your stake and it spits out returns instantly, fractions or decimals. There’s also the fiddly ones — trebles returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, yankees, which is where I always got it wrong. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/lucky-15]lucky 15 calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    One thing that genuinely shifted things for me were the geekier tools. There’s an probability calculator and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion calculator — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool is decent for when I’m covering two or three runners.

    Not all sunshine though. The layout is very functional, let’s say — zero polish, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s usable but the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. Also there’s no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

    So yeah. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone honestly works out returns on a calculator app, try it — saved me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  3. Such writing is increasingly rare and worth supporting through attention, and a stop at rasecurities extended that supportive attention across more pages, the conscious choice to spend time on sites that produce careful work rather than convenient consumption is itself a small form of patronage and this site is receiving that conscious patronage from me.

  4. Honestly impressed by how much useful content sits in such a small post, and a stop at qorivobonding confirmed the rest of the site packs a similar punch, density without confusion is a hard balance to strike and this site has clearly cracked the code on it across many different topic areas covered.

  5. A piece that brought a sense of order to a topic I had been finding chaotic, and a look at fullertonrecall continued that organising effect, content that imposes useful structure on messy subjects is doing genuine intellectual work and this site is providing that organisational function across multiple posts I have read recently here.

  6. Nice to see a post that does not try to overcomplicate the basics for the sake of looking smart, and once I looked at pelixobond the same direct tone was there too, which honestly makes a difference when you are short on time and want answers without long pointless intros.

  7. Honestly this kind of writing is why I still bother to read independent sites, and a look at vixarotrust extended that broader reflection, the few sites that justify continued attention to non algorithmic content are sites like this one and finding them periodically is enough to keep my reading habits oriented toward independent rather than aggregated content.

  8. A piece that handled a controversial angle without becoming heated, and a look at sunnyflowercases continued that calm engagement, content that can address contested topics without inflaming them is doing rare diplomatic work and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to handle sensitive material with the appropriate temperature of writing throughout.

  9. Right — have been messing about with this thing for about six months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m based in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, small stakes, so take it how you like.

    The reason I started using it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an each way payout actually was when the place terms changed. I used to just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I type the odds in before every slip, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator is the one I use most — you drop in the price and your stake and you get returns instantly, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the bigger stuff — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, which is where most people I know mess it up. Have a go yourself, it lives at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/super-heinz]whats a super heinz bet[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    What genuinely made a difference is the nerdier bits. The probability converter and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly calculator — I stick to fractional kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m splitting a race.

    Not all sunshine though. Its interface feels pretty plain — zero frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it works but the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. And nothing on the app store, just the site — fine by me just flagging it.

    So yeah. Doesn’t cost anything, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone even now does the maths on paper, try it — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.

  10. A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at maverotrustco continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.

  11. The conclusions felt earned rather than tacked on at the end like an afterthought, and a look at dankglassonline kept that careful structure going, you can tell when a writer has thought about the shape of their post versus just letting it ramble out and hoping for the best at the end which most do.

  12. OK — have been messing about with this thing for maybe five months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d say something since someone asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, generally bet football and racing, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was genuinely a bit daft — I couldn’t ever work out what an each way payout actually was when the place terms changed. Basically I’d wing it and get a shock. Now punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator tool is the bit I use most — type in the price and your stake and it spits out the return with no faffing, fractions or decimals. There’s also the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, honestly that’s where I always lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-63]lucky 63 bet365[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    One thing that genuinely shifted things for me is the more serious extras. The implied probability calculator and it makes obvious the overround, plus a kelly criterion tool — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. The dutch tool is decent for when I’m splitting a race.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout is a bit basic — not much flash, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. Phone-wise it works though the acca grid are a squeeze. And no app, it’s browser only — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, works. If anyone honestly does the maths on paper, have a look — saves me a load of arguments with the bookie.

  13. So — been using this thing for maybe four months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m UK based, generally stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was genuinely a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an each way return actually was once you get five places instead of three. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. Now punch the numbers in first, every time, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator is the bit I open most — type in stake and odds and you get the return instantly, fractions or decimals. There’s also the multiples — acca and treble maths, lucky 15s, yankees, honestly that’s where most people I know mess it up. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/matched-betting]matched betting risk free bet calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    The thing that genuinely changed how I bet is the more serious extras. The odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is terrifying. The dutching one is handy too when I’m covering two or three runners.

    Not all sunshine though. The interface is very functional, let’s say — no polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s usable though the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. There’s no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Free, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. Anyone who still does the maths on paper, give it a go — it’s saved me a fair few dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  14. OK — been using this thing for about four months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d chuck my thoughts in since a mate asked me last week. I’m UK based, mostly do football and horses, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    The reason I started using it was honestly pretty stupid — I never could work out what an each way payout would be with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just wing it and get a shock. Now type the odds in before I place anything, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the one I use most — type in the price and your stake and it shows returns instantly, fractions or decimals. There’s also the multiples — trebles returns, lucky 15s, yankees, and that’s where I always lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/patent]work out patent bet[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    One thing that genuinely shifted things for me is the nerdier extras. There’s an probability converter which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m splitting a race.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout is a bit basic — not much frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s usable though the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. There’s no proper app, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If anyone still works out returns on a calculator app, try it — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  15. OK — been using this thing for something like five months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, mainly stick to footie and the horses, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I could never figure out what an ew payout would be when the place terms changed. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the part I’m on daily — you drop in your stake, the odds and you get profit and total return straight away, fractions or decimals. Same tool covers the bigger stuff — doubles and trebles returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, yankees, honestly that’s where I always got it wrong. Have a go yourself, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/odds-converter]odds format converter[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    What really shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. The implied probability calculator that shows how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly staking tool — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator is handy too if I’m covering two or three runners.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout feels very functional, let’s say — no frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On my phone it’s usable but the acca grid are a squeeze. There’s no app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If anyone even now works out returns on a calculator app, have a look — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.

  16. Bookmark earned, calendar reminder set, share queued, all from one good post, and a look at moeinclub did the same, when a single reading session triggers multiple downstream actions you know the content has actually moved me beyond the page and this site is moving me at that higher level reliably.

  17. One of the more honest takes on the topic I have seen lately, no spin and no oversell, and a stop at morix kept that going, the kind of voice the open web could use a lot more of rather than the endless echo chamber of recycled opinions floating around every social platform these days.

  18. Now leaving a small mental note to recommend this when the topic comes up in conversation, and a look at pg-o2o extended that recommend ready feeling, content that arms me with shareable references for likely future conversations is content with social value and this site is providing that conversational ammunition consistently for me lately.

  19. OK — been using this thing for something like six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, mainly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, so take it how you like.

    The reason I started using it was actually embarrassing — I couldn’t ever work out what an each way payout actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now punch the numbers in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator is the one I’m on daily — type in stake and odds and you get profit and total return straight away, either odds format. It also handles the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always lose track. If you want a look, it’s over at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/super-heinz]super heinz betting[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that genuinely shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. They’ve got an probability thing which shows you the overround, plus a kelly calculator — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. Dutching calculator is decent if I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — not much frills, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. On my phone it works but the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. And no app, just the site — slight shame but you asked.

    So yeah. Costs nowt, no ads shoved in your face, works. If anyone still works out returns on a calculator app, try it — saved me a fair few arguments with the bookie.

  20. So — have been messing about with this thing for maybe a few months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d say something since a mate asked me a few days back. I’m in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, so take it how you like.

    What got me on it was actually a bit daft — I never could get my head round what an each way payout actually was with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just eyeball it and then be surprised. Now type the odds in before every slip, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator is the part I’m on daily — type in the price and your stake and it shows returns instantly, fractions or decimals. It also handles the fiddly ones — acca and treble returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, honestly that’s where I’d always mess it up. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/trixie]union jack trixie bet calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    The thing that genuinely changed how I bet was the geekier bits. They’ve got an probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. Dutching calculator is handy too when I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — no polish, it’s clearly function over form. On my phone it works though the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — slight shame but worth saying.

    Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does the job. If you honestly works out returns on a calculator app, try it — it’s saved me a load of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  21. Well crafted post, the structure flows naturally from one point to the next without forcing transitions, and a stop at korivonext kept the same flow going, you can tell when a writer has thought about how their content reads rather than just what it contains and this is one of those examples.

  22. Most of the time I feel the open web is in decline and then I find a site like this, and a stop at longtermvaluepartnership reinforced that mood lift, the cumulative effect of finding occasional excellent independent content versus the cumulative effect of finding mostly mediocre content is real for the long term reader maintaining web habits today.

  23. Once I had read three posts the editorial pattern was clear, and a look at cavarotrust confirmed the pattern from a fourth angle, sites where the underlying approach reveals itself through accumulated reading rather than being announced are sites with real depth and this one has that quality clearly visible across multiple pieces consistently.

  24. Decided this was the best thing I had read all morning, and a stop at corecompanynyc kept that ranking intact, ranking my reading is something I do mentally throughout the day and the top rank is competitive and not easily won but this site won it without needing to overstate its claims for that.

  25. A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at thirtymale continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.

  26. Now feeling something close to gratitude for the fact this site exists, and a look at spikeisland2020 extended that gratitude, the rare site that produces this kind of response is the rare site worth defending in conversations about whether the modern internet is still capable of producing genuinely valuable independent content for serious adults.

  27. Even from a single post the editorial care is clear, and a stop at zylavocore extended that care across more pages, the kind of attention to quality that shows up in every paragraph is what separates serious sites from the rest and this one has clearly invested in that paragraph level attention across what I have read.

  28. Reading this felt easy in the best way, no friction and no confusion at any point, and a stop at xanerotrust carried that same comfort across more pages, the kind of editorial flow that lets you absorb information without fighting the format which is increasingly hard to find on the open web today across topics.

  29. Closed several other tabs to focus on this one as I read, and a stop at LibertyCadillac held my undivided attention the same way, content that earns full focus in an attention environment full of competing pulls is content doing something genuinely well and the team behind it deserves recognition for that achievement consistently.

  30. A piece that handled a controversial angle without becoming heated, and a look at ManilaTakeout continued that calm engagement, content that can address contested topics without inflaming them is doing rare diplomatic work and this site has clearly developed the editorial maturity to handle sensitive material with the appropriate temperature of writing throughout.

  31. Approaching this site through a casual link click and being surprised by what I found, and a look at ulvionbond extended the surprise, the rare experience of stumbling into excellent independent content rather than predictable mediocrity is one of the actual remaining pleasures of casual web browsing and this site provided it cleanly.

  32. Bookmark earned, share earned, return visit earned, all from one reading session, and a look at xanerotrustco did the same, the trifecta of bookmark and share and return is rare in a single visit and represents the highest level of engagement I tend to offer any piece of online content these days here.

  33. Solid post, the structure is easy to follow and the language stays simple even when the topic gets a bit more involved, and a look at sega-live kept that same standard going, so I left feeling like the time spent here was actually worth something for once which is rare lately.

  34. Воронеж, всем привет Близкий человек уже несколько дней в запое Соседи стучат в стену Таблетки не помогают Короче, врач приехал и поставил систему — врач нарколог на дом с капельницей Приехал через 40 минут В общем, жмите чтобы сохранить — срочная наркологическая помощь на дому [url=https://czena.narkolog-na-dom-voronezh-14.ru]https://czena.narkolog-na-dom-voronezh-14.ru[/url] Не ждите пока станет хуже Перешлите тем кто в такой же ситуации

  35. Right — been on this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so figured I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me the other day. Am in the UK, mainly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, so take it how you like.

    What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I could never work out what an each way payout actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just eyeball it and get a shock. Now I punch the numbers in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows profit and total return instantly, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, and that’s where most people I know mess it up. If you fancy a poke about, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/accumulator]accumulator[/url] — free, no signup.

    What actually shifted things for me was the more serious extras. They’ve got an probability converter that shows the overround, and there’s the kelly staking tool — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. The layout looks very functional, let’s say — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it works but the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. And no app, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    So yeah. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, works. If you honestly works out returns on a calculator app, have a look — it’s saved me plenty of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  36. A genuine compliment to the writer for keeping the post focused on what mattered, and a look at ThirtyMale continued that disciplined focus, focus is a editorial choice that compounds across many small decisions and this site has clearly made those small decisions consistently across what I have read so far this week here.

  37. Люди подскажите Близкий человек уже несколько дней в запое Жена в истерике Таблетки не помогают Короче, только это реально спасло — вывод из запоя на дому нижний новгород цена фиксированная Поставили капельницу с детоксикационным раствором В общем, вся инфа по ссылке — вывести из запоя цена [url=https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-nizhnij-novgorod.ru]https://alkogolizm.vyvod-iz-zapoya-na-domu-nizhnij-novgorod.ru[/url] Не ждите пока станет хуже Перешлите тем кто в такой же ситуации

  38. So — been using this thing for about six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since a mate asked me the other day. Am based in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    What got me on it was actually pretty stupid — I never could get my head round what an e/w return actually was once you get five places instead of three. Basically I’d eyeball it and get a shock. Now I punch the numbers in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the one I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it spits out the return with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the bigger stuff — trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, and that’s where I’d always lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/implied-probability]how to calculate implied probability with decimal odds[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What actually changed how I bet is the more serious bits. The implied probability converter which shows you the overround, plus a kelly tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutch tool is decent when I’m spreading across selections.

    Not all sunshine though. The layout feels pretty plain — no frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works but the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — slight shame but you asked.

    Right, that’s me. Free, barely any ads, works. If anyone even now adds it up in their head, have a look — it’s saved me plenty of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  39. Right — have been messing about with this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me last week. Am UK based, generally do football and horses, a fiver here and there, for context.

    What got me on it was honestly embarrassing — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew return actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. Now type the odds in before every slip, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the one I open most — you put in your stake, the odds and it spits out returns straight away, either odds format. It also handles the multiples — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, which is where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/matched-betting]matched betting calculator excel[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that actually made a difference were the geekier tools. There’s an implied probability thing which shows you the overround, and a kelly tool — I use half kelly as the full version is terrifying. Dutching calculator is handy too for when I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface looks very functional, let’s say — no frills, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it’s usable though the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. And no proper app, just the site — slight shame but you asked.

    So yeah. Costs nowt, no ads shoved in your face, works. Anyone who even now adds it up in their head, give it a go — saved me plenty of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  40. Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at ravionline extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *