Don’t ask me for money just because I am rich – Tiwa Savage

Don’t ask me for money just because I am rich – Tiwa Savage

Afrobeat sensation Tiwa Savage has bragged about her riches while advising everyone to work hard instead of approaching her for money.

The singer, via her Instagram story, asserted that as the year progresses, she is working on improving rather than proving herself.

She bragged about her wealth while admonishing others not to approach her for money because of her status.

Read Also:

Burna Boy equals Davido’s record on US Apple Music chart

Tiwa Savage advised everyone to go hustle because everyone has the same 24 hours in a day.

Her words: “2024 I’m working on improving myself Rather than proving myself Read that again Iyalaya anybody. I’m rich bit$h.

“But no mean say all yall leeches should ask me for money o We all gat the same 24 hours in a day GO HUSTLE.”

19,322 Comments

  1. OK — been using this thing for about six months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d write something up since a mate asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I could never work out what an ew payout would be when the place terms changed. Basically I’d eyeball it and moan when the payout landed. Now I stick my stake in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.

    The single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows the return with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the multiples — acca and treble returns, a lucky 15, a yankee, and that’s where I always lose track. If you want a look, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-15]how much is a 50p each way lucky 15[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    The thing that actually shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. There’s an implied probability calculator which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly as the full version is terrifying. The dutching one gets used a fair bit if I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. The interface feels a bit basic — not much flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works although the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — slight shame just flagging it.

    So yeah. Free, not plastered in adverts, works. Anyone who honestly does the maths on paper, try it — it’s saved me a load of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  2. Right — been using this thing for something like six months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since someone asked me last week. Am based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, small stakes, for context.

    How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew payout actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator is the part I open most — type in stake and odds and it spits out returns with no faffing, either odds format. There’s also the fiddly ones — acca and treble returns, a lucky 15, yankees, which is where most people I know got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/treble]football treble bet[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What genuinely shifted things for me is the more serious bits. The odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious what margin’s baked in, and a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutching one is decent for when I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. The layout feels pretty plain — no frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works but the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. There’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If anyone still adds it up in their head, have a look — saves me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  3. plinko registration bd [url=https://www.plinko64614.icu]plinko registration bd[/url]

  4. OK — been on this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d say something since a mate asked me last week. I’m in the UK, mainly do football and horses, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was honestly a bit daft — I couldn’t ever figure out what an e/w payout would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just guess and moan when the payout landed. Now I type the odds in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator is the bit I open most — type in the price and your stake and it spits out profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. It also handles the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/lucky-15]betfred lucky 15 calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What really made a difference were the more serious tools. They’ve got an odds-to-probability converter and it makes obvious the overround, and there’s the kelly tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit for when I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works although the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

    Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If anyone still does the maths on paper, give it a go — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  5. A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at rasecurities continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.

  6. OK — have been messing about with this thing for maybe a few months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, mostly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, for context.

    How I found it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever figure out what an e/w payout actually came to when the place terms changed. Basically I’d wing it and then be surprised. These days I punch the numbers in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the bit I open most — type in stake and odds and it shows profit and total return with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, and that’s where I’d always got it wrong. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/dutch]lay dutching calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    What actually changed how I bet is the more serious tools. There’s an implied probability thing which shows you what margin’s baked in, and a kelly tool — I use half kelly since full stakes are terrifying. Dutching calculator is handy too for when I’m spreading across selections.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface feels very functional, let’s say — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it’s usable though the acca grid are a squeeze. And nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — fine by me but worth saying.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does what it says. If anyone still adds it up in their head, try it — saves me a load of arguments with the bookie.

  7. So — been using this thing for about five months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d say something since someone asked me last week. Am in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.

    The reason I started using it was actually a bit daft — I could never work out what an each way payout actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now type the odds in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator is the part I open most — you put in stake and odds and it spits out returns instantly, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the bigger stuff — trebles maths, lucky 15s, a yankee, which is where I’d always mess it up. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/implied-probability]odds probability calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    One thing that really made a difference is the nerdier tools. They’ve got an probability calculator which shows you what margin’s baked in, and there’s the kelly calculator — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is terrifying. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit if I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. The design is very functional, let’s say — not much flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it works though the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. There’s nothing on the app store, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, barely any ads, works. If you honestly works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saves me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  8. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at vixarotrust continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  9. Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at pelixobond fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.

  10. Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at fullertonrecall maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.

  11. A particular kind of restraint shows up in the writing, and a look at sunnyflowercases maintained the same restraint across pages, knowing what not to say is just as important as knowing what to say and this site has clearly developed strong instincts on both sides of that editorial line throughout pieces I have read.

  12. A piece that exhibited the kind of patience that good writing requires, and a look at maverotrustco continued that patient quality, hurried writing is easy to spot and this site reads as having been written without time pressure which produces a different feel than the rushed content that dominates much of the modern blog space.

  13. Now noticing that the post avoided the temptation to be funny in places where humour would have undermined the substance, and a stop at dankglassonline maintained the same restraint, knowing when to be serious is a rare editorial virtue and this site has clearly developed it through what I assume is careful editorial practice over years.

  14. plinko tarjeta debito deposito [url=plinko88873.icu]plinko tarjeta debito deposito[/url]

  15. Picked this for my morning read because the topic seemed worth the time, and a look at morix confirmed the choice was right, my morning reading slot is precious and giving it to this site felt like a good investment rather than a waste which is a higher endorsement than I usually offer for content.

  16. 1win bonus bildirişləri [url=http://1win01825.help/]1win bonus bildirişləri[/url]

  17. Solid information that lines up with what I have been hearing from other reliable sources, and after my visit to moeinclub I was even more certain of that, this site checks out which is something I value highly when so many places online play loose with the facts to chase a quick click.

  18. Really like that the writer trusts the reader to follow simple logic without restating every previous point, and a stop at spikeisland2020 kept that respect going, treating an audience as capable adults rather than as people who need constant hand holding makes a noticeable difference in the reading experience for me.

  19. Right — have been messing about with this thing for about six months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m in the UK, generally bet football and racing, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    The reason I started using it was genuinely pretty stupid — I couldn’t ever figure out what an each way payout actually came to when the place terms changed. I’d just eyeball it and moan when the payout landed. Now stick my stake in before I place anything, even a simple single bet.

    Their single bet calculator is the part I’m on daily — you put in the price and your stake and it shows returns instantly, either odds format. Same tool covers the bigger stuff — trebles returns, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, which is where I’d always lose track. If you want a look, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/kelly-criterion]half kelly calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    One thing that really shifted things for me were the more serious extras. There’s an probability converter which shows you what margin’s baked in, plus a kelly staking tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutching one is decent when I’m covering two or three runners.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — not much frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works but the acca grid make you pinch and zoom. There’s no proper app, it’s browser only — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    So yeah. Costs nowt, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If you honestly works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  20. Reading this slowly in the morning before opening email, and a stop at korivonext extended that protected attention, content that earns the prime morning reading slot before the daily distractions begin is content with elevated status and this site has earned that prime slot consistently in my recent reading habits clearly.

  21. Most of the time I feel the open web is in decline and then I find a site like this, and a stop at longtermvaluepartnership reinforced that mood lift, the cumulative effect of finding occasional excellent independent content versus the cumulative effect of finding mostly mediocre content is real for the long term reader maintaining web habits today.

  22. So — been using this thing for maybe five months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so figured I’d chuck my thoughts in since a mate asked me a few days back. I’m in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was genuinely pretty stupid — I never could get my head round what an e/w return actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. Basically I’d wing it and then be surprised. Now I stick my stake in before every slip, even a simple single bet.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the part I open most — you put in stake and odds and it spits out returns with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the fiddly ones — trebles returns, a lucky 15, a yankee, and that’s where I always got it wrong. If you want a look, it lives at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-63]lucky 63 betmentor calculator[/url] — free, no signup.

    What genuinely changed how I bet were the geekier bits. They’ve got an probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and a kelly staking calculator — I use half kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutching one gets used a fair bit when I’m covering two or three runners.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its layout feels pretty plain — no frills, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it works though the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. And no app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

    Anyway. Free, barely any ads, does what it says. Anyone who honestly does the maths on paper, give it a go — it’s saved me a load of arguments with the bookie.

  23. So — have been messing about with this thing for maybe six months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d say something since a mate asked me the other day. I’m based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, small stakes, so take it how you like.

    What got me on it was honestly embarrassing — I could never get my head round what an e/w return would be with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just wing it and then be surprised. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator is the one I open most — you drop in your stake, the odds and you get returns with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. There’s also the bigger stuff — acca and treble returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, which is where I always lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/accumulator]odds accumulator calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    One thing that genuinely shifted things for me is the nerdier extras. There’s an probability calculator that shows the overround, and there’s the kelly staking tool — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is terrifying. The dutch tool is handy too for when I’m covering two or three runners.

    Couple of gripes. Its interface is pretty plain — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On my phone it’s fine but the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. There’s nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — fine by me just flagging it.

    So yeah. Costs nowt, barely any ads, works. If anyone still works out returns on a calculator app, have a look — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  24. Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at zylavocore only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.

  25. Most blog writing on this subject reaches for the same handful of arguments and this post avoided them, and a look at corecompanynyc continued the original treatment, content that finds its own path through territory other writers have flattened is content with real authorial energy and this site has plenty of that distinctive energy.

  26. Started imagining how I would explain the topic to someone else after reading, and a look at LibertyCadillac gave me more material for that imagined explanation, content that improves my own ability to discuss a topic is content that has actually transferred knowledge rather than just decorating my screen for a few minutes.

  27. Useful enough to recommend to several people I know who would appreciate it, and a stop at maverotrustline added more material I will pass along too, the kind of writing that earns word of mouth is the kind that actually delivers on its promises which is what this site does without any drama or fanfare attached.

  28. Worth pointing out that the writing reads as confident without being defensive about it, and a look at cavarotrust extended that secure tone, content that does not pre emptively argue against imagined critics has a different quality from defensive writing and this site reads as written from a place of real ease.

  29. Worth your time, that is the simplest endorsement I can give, and a stop at pg-o2o extends that endorsement across the rest of the site, this is one of those increasingly rare places that delivers on what it promises rather than over selling the content and under delivering on substance every time which I find frustrating elsewhere.

  30. Felt mildly happier after reading, which sounds silly but is true, and a look at thirtymale extended that small mood lift, content that improves rather than degrades my mental state is content I want more of and the cumulative effect of reading sites that lift versus sites that drag is real over time.

  31. Right — been on this thing for about four months now and I keep coming back, so figured I’d say something since a mate asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    The reason I started using it was genuinely embarrassing — I could never get my head round what an each way return actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now I punch the numbers in before I place anything, even a straight one-selection punt.

    The single bet calculator is the bit I use most — type in stake and odds and it shows the return with no faffing, fractions or decimals. Same tool covers the fiddly ones — trebles returns, lucky 15s, yankees, which is where I always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/kelly-criterion]half kelly calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that really shifted things for me was the more serious tools. There’s an odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious how much the bookie’s taking, and there’s the kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit if I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface feels very functional, let’s say — not much frills, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. On mobile it works though the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. And no proper app, just the site — fine by me just flagging it.

    Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, no ads shoved in your face, works. If you even now does the maths on paper, have a look — saves me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  32. Reading this felt easy in the best way, no friction and no confusion at any point, and a stop at xanerotrust carried that same comfort across more pages, the kind of editorial flow that lets you absorb information without fighting the format which is increasingly hard to find on the open web today across topics.

  33. Люди помогите советом Брат снова сорвался Жена в истерике Нужен врач прямо сейчас Короче, единственный кто реально помог — нарколог на дом цена доступная Осмотрел и поставил капельницу В общем, жмите чтобы сохранить — вызов нарколога на дом стоимость [url=https://zapoj.narkolog-na-dom-nizhnij-novgorod-3.ru]https://zapoj.narkolog-na-dom-nizhnij-novgorod-3.ru[/url] Не ждите пока станет хуже Перешлите тем кто в такой же ситуации

  34. Worth saying that the quiet confidence of the writing is what landed first, and a look at ThirtyMale continued that quiet quality, confident writing without the loud display of confidence is a rare combination and this site has clearly developed both the knowledge and the editorial restraint to land that combination consistently.

  35. Will be back, that is the simplest way to say it, and a quick visit to ravionline reinforced the decision, this site has earned a spot in my regular rotation alongside a few other reliable places I check when I want something genuinely informative without all the usual modern web noise getting in the way.

  36. Strong recommendation from me, anyone curious about the topic should make time for this, and a look at xanerotrustco only sharpens that recommendation further, the kind of resource that holds up against careful scrutiny rather than crumbling at the first critical question is rare and worth pointing other people toward when the topic comes up.

  37. A piece that ended with a clean landing rather than fading out, and a look at xelariotrustco maintained the same crisp conclusions, endings that resolve rather than dissolve are a sign of careful structural thinking and this site has clearly invested in how its pieces conclude rather than letting them simply run out of energy.

  38. Reading this with a fresh mind in the morning brought out details I might have missed in the afternoon, and a stop at cnsbiodesk earned the same fresh attention, content that rewards being read at full attention rather than at energy lows is content with real density and this site has that density consistently.

  39. A nicely understated post that does not shout for attention, and a look at ulvionbond maintained the same quiet quality, understatement is a stylistic choice that distinguishes serious writing from attention seeking writing and this site has clearly committed to the understated approach as a core editorial value rather than just a phase.

  40. Excellent execution from start to finish, the post never loses its rhythm and the points stay sharp, and a quick stop at sega-live kept the same level going, consistency like this across a site is the marker of a serious operation rather than a casual side project running on autopilot somewhere else.

  41. Liked how the post handled an objection I was forming as I read, and a stop at longtermbusinesspartnerships similarly anticipated where my thinking was going next, the rare writer who can predict reader concerns and address them in advance is doing something most online content fails to do despite that being basic editorial work.

  42. Now considering writing a longer note about the post somewhere, and a look at qelarobond added more material for that note, content that prompts me to write rather than just consume is content with generative energy and this site is producing that generative effect for me at a higher rate than most sources.

  43. Picked this up between two other things I was doing and got drawn in completely, and after zz-meta my original tasks were completely forgotten for a while, content that derails a workflow in a positive way by being more interesting than what you were already doing is rare and worth recognising clearly.

  44. Looking for similar voices elsewhere has come up empty in my recent searches, and a stop at almostfashionablemovie extended the search frustration, the rare site that does what no other does in quite the same way is precious and this one has clearly developed a particular approach that I have not been able to find duplicates of.

  45. Worth marking this site as one to come back to deliberately rather than by accident, and a stop at zylavocapital reinforced that intention, the difference between sites I find again by chance and sites I return to on purpose is meaningful and this one has clearly moved into the deliberate return category for me.

  46. So — been on this thing for something like a few months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d say something since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, mostly bet football and racing, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was honestly embarrassing — I couldn’t ever figure out what an each way return actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I used to just guess and get a shock. Now I type the odds in before every slip, even a simple single bet.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the bit I’m on daily — you put in stake and odds and it shows profit and total return with no faffing, either odds format. There’s also the multiples — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, a yankee, honestly that’s where I’d always lose track. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/double]double bet[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    The thing that genuinely changed how I bet was the nerdier extras. They’ve got an odds-to-probability converter which shows you the overround, plus a kelly criterion calculator — I use half kelly because full kelly is terrifying. Dutching calculator is decent if I’m covering two or three runners.

    Not all sunshine though. The interface feels pretty plain — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On my phone it’s fine although the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — slight shame but worth saying.

    So yeah. Free, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. If anyone still does the maths on paper, try it — it’s saved me a load of dumb bets I’d have regretted.

  47. Found this useful, the points line up well with what I have been thinking about lately, and a stop at HanaCapeCoral added some angles I had not considered yet, definitely walking away with more than I came for which is the best outcome from time spent reading online for any kind of topic.

  48. Слушайте кто сталкивался Брат снова сорвался Жена в истерике В больницу тащить страшно Короче, врач приехал и поставил систему — нарколог на дом воронеж недорого Приехал через 40 минут В общем, телефон и цены тут — врач нарколог круглосуточно [url=https://kodirovanie.narkolog-na-dom-voronezh15.ru]https://kodirovanie.narkolog-na-dom-voronezh15.ru[/url] Звоните прямо сейчас Перешлите тем кто в такой же ситуации

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *