Don’t ask me for money just because I am rich – Tiwa Savage

Don’t ask me for money just because I am rich – Tiwa Savage

Afrobeat sensation Tiwa Savage has bragged about her riches while advising everyone to work hard instead of approaching her for money.

The singer, via her Instagram story, asserted that as the year progresses, she is working on improving rather than proving herself.

She bragged about her wealth while admonishing others not to approach her for money because of her status.

Read Also:

Burna Boy equals Davido’s record on US Apple Music chart

Tiwa Savage advised everyone to go hustle because everyone has the same 24 hours in a day.

Her words: “2024 I’m working on improving myself Rather than proving myself Read that again Iyalaya anybody. I’m rich bit$h.

“But no mean say all yall leeches should ask me for money o We all gat the same 24 hours in a day GO HUSTLE.”

12,460 Comments

  1. OK — been using this thing for about six months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so thought I’d write something up since a mate asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, a fiver here and there, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I could never work out what an ew payout would be when the place terms changed. Basically I’d eyeball it and moan when the payout landed. Now I stick my stake in first, every time, even a straight one-selection punt.

    The single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — you drop in your stake, the odds and it shows the return with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the multiples — acca and treble returns, a lucky 15, a yankee, and that’s where I always lose track. If you want a look, it’s over at [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/lucky-15]how much is a 50p each way lucky 15[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    The thing that actually shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. There’s an implied probability calculator which shows you how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly as the full version is terrifying. The dutching one gets used a fair bit if I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. The interface feels a bit basic — not much flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works although the lucky 63 breakdown are a squeeze. Also there’s no app, it’s browser only — slight shame just flagging it.

    So yeah. Free, not plastered in adverts, works. Anyone who honestly does the maths on paper, try it — it’s saved me a load of “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  2. Right — been using this thing for something like six months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, reckon I’d chuck my thoughts in since someone asked me last week. Am based in the UK, generally bet football and racing, small stakes, for context.

    How I found it was honestly pretty stupid — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew payout actually was when the place terms changed. I’d just wing it and moan when the payout landed. These days I type the odds in before I place anything, even a straight one-selection punt.

    Their single bet calculator is the part I open most — type in stake and odds and it spits out returns with no faffing, either odds format. There’s also the fiddly ones — acca and treble returns, a lucky 15, yankees, which is where most people I know got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here [url=https://singlebettingcalculator.uk/bet-calculator/treble]football treble bet[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What genuinely shifted things for me is the more serious bits. The odds-to-probability thing and it makes obvious what margin’s baked in, and a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly since full stakes are terrifying. The dutching one is decent for when I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. The layout feels pretty plain — no frills, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it works but the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. There’s nothing on the app store, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does the job. If anyone still adds it up in their head, have a look — saves me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  3. plinko registration bd [url=https://www.plinko64614.icu]plinko registration bd[/url]

  4. OK — been on this thing for something like four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d say something since a mate asked me last week. I’m in the UK, mainly do football and horses, nothing mad, just so you know where I’m coming from.

    What got me on it was honestly a bit daft — I couldn’t ever figure out what an e/w payout would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just guess and moan when the payout landed. Now I type the odds in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator is the bit I open most — type in the price and your stake and it spits out profit and total return with no faffing, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. It also handles the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/lucky-15]betfred lucky 15 calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    What really made a difference were the more serious tools. They’ve got an odds-to-probability converter and it makes obvious the overround, and there’s the kelly tool — I run quarter kelly since full stakes are far too aggressive. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit for when I’m spreading across selections.

    Couple of gripes. Its layout looks very functional, let’s say — no flash, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it works although the bigger tables make you pinch and zoom. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — doesn’t bother me but you asked.

    Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does the job. If anyone still does the maths on paper, give it a go — it’s saved me a fair few “wait, that’s it?” moments.

  5. A thoughtful piece that did not strain to be thoughtful, and a look at rasecurities continued that effortless quality, when thinking shows up in writing without the writer drawing attention to it you know you are reading something genuinely considered rather than something performing the appearance of consideration which is also common online.

  6. OK — have been messing about with this thing for maybe a few months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me last week. I’m UK based, mostly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, for context.

    How I found it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever figure out what an e/w payout actually came to when the place terms changed. Basically I’d wing it and then be surprised. These days I punch the numbers in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    Their single bet calculator tool is the bit I open most — type in stake and odds and it shows profit and total return with no faffing, either odds format. It also handles the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, and that’s where I’d always got it wrong. If you want a look, it’s here [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/dutch]lay dutching calculator[/url] and it’s free with no account nonsense.

    What actually changed how I bet is the more serious tools. There’s an implied probability thing which shows you what margin’s baked in, and a kelly tool — I use half kelly since full stakes are terrifying. Dutching calculator is handy too for when I’m spreading across selections.

    It’s not perfect mind. Its interface feels very functional, let’s say — zero polish, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it’s usable though the acca grid are a squeeze. And nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — fine by me but worth saying.

    Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, no ads shoved in your face, does what it says. If anyone still adds it up in their head, try it — saves me a load of arguments with the bookie.

  7. So — been using this thing for about five months now and I keep coming back, reckon I’d say something since someone asked me last week. Am in the UK, mainly bet football and racing, nothing mad, for context.

    The reason I started using it was actually a bit daft — I could never work out what an each way payout actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just guess and then be surprised. Now type the odds in first, every time, even a simple single bet.

    The single bet calculator is the part I open most — you put in stake and odds and it spits out returns instantly, fractional or decimal, doesn’t matter. Same tool covers the bigger stuff — trebles maths, lucky 15s, a yankee, which is where I’d always mess it up. If you fancy a poke about, it lives at [url=https://freebet-calculator.com/bet-calculator/implied-probability]odds probability calculator[/url] and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.

    One thing that really made a difference is the nerdier tools. They’ve got an probability calculator which shows you what margin’s baked in, and there’s the kelly calculator — I run quarter kelly because full kelly is terrifying. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit if I’m splitting a race.

    It’s not perfect mind. The design is very functional, let’s say — not much flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. On mobile it works though the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. There’s nothing on the app store, just the site — doesn’t bother me just flagging it.

    Anyway. Costs nowt, barely any ads, works. If you honestly works out returns on a calculator app, give it a go — saves me plenty of arguments with the bookie.

  8. Felt the post had been written without looking over its shoulder, and a look at vixarotrust continued that confident posture, content written for its own sake rather than against imagined critics has a different quality and this site reads as written from a place of confidence rather than defensive justification of every claim.

  9. Reading this in the time it took to drink half a cup of coffee, and a stop at pelixobond fit naturally into the second half, content that respects the rhythms of a typical morning is content with practical fit and this site has the kind of length and pacing that works for the way I actually read.

  10. Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at fullertonrecall maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *